Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
Statement
Statement on The Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade and Consumer Protection
National Invention Services, Inc., and John F. Lee
M.J.S. Financial Services, Inc., et al.
Lundgren & Associates, P.C., and Alvin R. Lundgren., U.S.
Travel Bahamas Tours, Inc., and Richard A. Raskin
PacifiCorp, In the Matter of
The Commission withdrew a proposed consent agreement that settled allegations that PacifiCorp's proposed acquisition of The Energy Group PLC would lead to increases in wholesale and retail electricity prices in the United States. During the comment period PacificCorp withdrew its bid after the Texas Utilities Company announced a competing tender offer for The Energy Group.
Cano, Nia; a/k/a, Nghia F. Cano, Nina DeCano, et al.
Global Industrial Technologies, Inc., In the Matter of
Global Industrial Technologies, Inc. agreed to restructure its proposed acquisition of AP Green Industries, Inc. to resolve FTC allegations that the merger would likely substantially reduce competition by combining the two largest domestic producers of glass-furnace silica refractories in the United States. Under the terms of a settlement, Global divested AP Green’s silica refractories business to a Commission-approved buyer.
Nutrivida, Inc., In the Matter of
Altmeyer Home Stores, Inc., In the Matter of
Associated Octel Company Limited, The, and Great Lakes Chemical Corporation
The consent order settled charges that Ethyl and The Associated Octel Company Ltd. entered into an agreement whereby Ethyl agreed to stop manufacturing lead antiknock compounds and, in return, Octel agreed to supply Ethyl with a limited volume of lead antiknock compounds. The complaint issued with the consent order charged that the agreement eliminated competition between the two firms. Under the terms of the consent order, Octel must modify the agreement with Ethyl to remove price and volume restrictions and both firms are prohibited from disclosing to one another the prices that they charge their customers.