Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.
Displaying 1801 - 1820 of 4612
Date
Rule
801.10
No - the debt would still not be included.
File
Original Image File
(29.99 KB)
Date
Rule
802.30
What an odd transaction. I think the first scenario is exempt under 802.30 because Seller holds all of the voting securities of Newco and all of the non-corporate interests in Target LLC. In the...
File
Original Image File
(48.79 KB)
Date
Rule
802.2, 802.4
refer to MV Comments in BOLD
File
Original Image File
(72.1 KB)
Date
Rule
802.2(c)
05/24/2007 1) You are correct in all of your assumptions regarding physical separation of the parcels. I am not aware of any other specific boundaries that we have opined on. 2) The $5 MM limitation...
File
Original Image File
(50.24 KB)
Date
Rule
802.4
Use 802.50 in conjunction with 802.4, not 802.51. Agree not reportable.
File
Original Image File
(49.83 KB)
Date
Rule
802.51
05/22/2007 (refer to BOLD comments)
File
Original Image File
(82.42 KB)
Date
Rule
15 USC 18a(c)(1) - 7A(c)(1)
Agree with both.
File
Original Image File
(48.21 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(b)
Yes - they would control. A right to designate replacement directors in the by-laws is treated the same as a contractual right.
File
Original Image File
(29.41 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(b), 801.10
Assuming the brothers are adults and not minors, the sale of Corporation 1 (controlled by Brother X) is a separate transaction from the sales of Corporations 2, 3 and 4 (controlled by Brother Y)...
File
Original Image File
(59.85 KB)
Date
Rule
801.10
This is a $50 million deal. The value of the non-corporate interests of LLC B includes the value of the underlying minority interest in LLC C (despite the fact that the parties are separately...
File
Original Image File
(51.97 KB)
Date
Rule
802.35
Correct the company is the UPE, not the ESOP.
File
Original Image File
(39.19 KB)
Date
Rule
802.64
Note that point 1 is incorrect. Investment advisors are not institutional investors. All of the other conclusions are correct (revised 02/06/08). UPDATE March 2014: This is no longer the position of...
File
Original Image File
(342.18 KB)
Date
Rule
802.9, 802.64
- Agree Solely for purpose of investment is available. M. Bruno, K. Berg & K. Walsh concur.
File
Original Image File
(98.51 KB)
Displaying 1801 - 1820 of 4612