Skip to main content

Displaying 1 - 20 of 9927

Publishing.com, In the Matter of

Publishing.com LLC and its two principals will pay $1.5 million and be required to substantiate earnings claims in the future to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that the company and its operators misled consumers about how much money they were likely to earn using their products.

Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
242 3055
Case Status
Pending

TruHeight (Vanilla Chip LLC), In the Matter of

Nevada-based Vanilla Chip LLC, which does business as TruHeight, and its two principals, Eden Stelmach and Justin Rapoport, have agreed to settle the Federal Trade Commission’s charges that they deceptively advertised the effectiveness of a range of supplements touted as supporting height growth in children and teenagers, and relied on reviews that were written by their own employees, or by consumers who were offered a free product or discount in return for writing a 5-star review. 

Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
242 3093
Case Status
Pending

Wellington, FTC v.

The FTC alleged that Stormy Wellington used deceptive earnings claims to recruit new members to two multilevel marketing companies.

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
242 3093
Case Status
Pending

StubHub Holdings, FTC v.

In April 2026, the FTC announced that StubHub, the nation’s largest ticket exchange and resale ticket provider, will pay $10 million to settle charges that the company violated the FTC Act and the agency’s Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees by deceptively advertising ticket prices on its website without clearly and conspicuously disclosing up-front how much consumers actually would pay, including all mandatory fees. 

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
252 3117
Case Status
Under Order

FTC Publishes New Strategic Plan

Date
The Federal Trade Commission has published its FY 2026-2030 Strategic Plan, which will guide the agency over the next five years. The new plan lays out the agency’s mission, vision, and goals and...

Lindsay Chevrolet, et al, FTC and State of Maryland v

 The FTC and Maryland Attorney General charged Lindsay Automotive Group with systematically deceiving and overcharging car-buying consumers for years, costing them millions of dollars in junk fees and unwanted add-on products.

In December 2024, the FTC and Maryland Attorney General charged Lindsay Automotive Group with systematically deceiving and overcharging car-buying consumers for years, costing them millions of dollars in junk fees and unwanted add-on products. In March 2026 the FTC announced a settlement in the case in which the defendants will pay full refunds and additional penalties to redress defrauded consumers.

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
2323032
Case Status
Pending