Legal Library: Search

Here is our position: 1. If a document makes a passing reference to synergies with no quantified dollar amount attached (e.g., the deal will result in synergies) this is not enough to make a document...

Note that all of these views are based on the fact that both agreements have been executed, despite the fact that they are not conditioned on one another. If only one agreement had been executed and...

Note that all of these views are based on the fact that both agreements have been executed, despite the fact that they are not conditioned on one another. If only one agreement had been executed and...

Here is our position: 1. If a document makes a passing reference to synergies with no quantified dollar amount attached (e.g., the deal will result in synergies) this is not enough to make a document...

owned by the UPE), you would need to supply info on its holders. If it is a partnership, again you would only supply the name of the GP. If it is a corporation or LLC (not wholly-owned), you would...

Same for 6(c)(ii)

Same for 6(c)(ii)

owned by the UPE), you would need to supply info on its holders. If it is a partnership, again you would only supply the name of the GP. If it is a corporation or LLC (not wholly-owned), you would...

Correct on both points 1) If the acquiring entity is an LP, then presumably the corporation is a limited partner. I would be surprised if that chain went any higher, because the corporation probably...

If there's a ClM dated within a year, submit it as 4(d)(i). We only need the ClM that went to the winning bidder and your approach is therefore fine. FYI, if the winning bidder did not retain a copy...