Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.
Displaying 2081 - 2100 of 4604
Date
Rule
801.11(e)
Agree nothing reportable.
File
Original Image File
(142.66 KB)
Date
Rule
802.2(c)
Contiguous properties must be aggregated
File
Original Image File
(42.23 KB)
Date
Rule
Form Item 6
Acquisition of LLC interest is not an asset deal. Limit Item 6 to the LLC, anything is controls.
File
Original Image File
(31.27 KB)
Date
Rule
803.5, Form Item 3(d)
Yes, thats fine. In the affidavit the third party should reference the anticipated assignment of the executed agreement. Something like: A purchase agreement has been executed by A and B which will be...
File
Original Image File
(35.64 KB)
Date
Rule
Continuum
You can subsume the A-B transaction in the reportable A-C transaction under the continuum theory as long as the two agreements are conditioned on one another and will occur contemporaneously. So only...
File
Original Image File
(40.9 KB)
Date
Rule
802.51
Agree the primary acquisitions are exempt. The secondary acquisitions of X are potentially reportable.
File
Original Image File
(44.42 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(b)
This is the correct analysis. I'm sorry if my advice mislead you in the previous analysis. Having an irrevocable proxy to vote 50% or more of the voting securities of an issuer does confer control...
File
Original Image File
(40.1 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(b)
The combination of irrevocable proxies with direct holding of voting securities that results in the ability to vote 50% or more of the shares does confer control. I think that the analysis in your...
File
Original Image File
(53.14 KB)
Date
Rule
802.3
Under exempt assets Im not sure what field processing pants are. Otherwise they look OK.
File
Original Image File
(41.97 KB)
Date
Rule
802.21
Yes to both new parent is deemed to be a successor to A as long as all it hold as a result of the reorganizations is A and anything A holds.
File
Original Image File
(42.36 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(b)
The entire 15% ownership of LLC B is attributed to the 52% member, I would assume that if the 15% was sold to a third party the considerations would be divided among all of the members of LLC A.
File
Original Image File
(37.04 KB)
Date
Rule
801.10
No any security with a current right to vote for the election of directors should be included in determining the value of the transaction.
File
Original Image File
(36.12 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(b)
Agree. M Verne concurs.
File
Original Image File
(42.76 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(b)
Newco is its own UPE.
File
Original Image File
(37.11 KB)
Date
Rule
801.11(b)
Agree see 1979 SBP for 801.11(b) it references prepared.
File
Original Image File
(30.57 KB)
Date
Rule
802.4
No but it is exempt under 802.4
File
Original Image File
(29.57 KB)
Displaying 2081 - 2100 of 4604