Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.
Displaying 3041 - 3060 of 4612
Date
Rule
801.11(b)(1)
Agree, 11/23/99. N. Ovuka concurs
File
Original Image File
(49.22 KB)
Date
Rule
802.2(d)
I concur with this letter. Called (redacted). 11/22/99.
File
Original Image File
(45.17 KB)
Date
Rule
F.I. 15; 801.12
Company 4 is its own ultimate parent since no one holds 50% of the v/s or has thecontractual right to designate a majority of the board. Company 1 is its ownultimate parent, as there has not yet been...
File
Original Image File
(80.71 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(f)(i)
so advised; called (redacted), 11/5/99 I concur with this letter
File
Original Image File
(24.7 KB)
Date
Rule
802.31, 801.1(f)(3)
(none)
File
Original Image File
(39.31 KB)
Date
Rule
801.10, 802.20
I concur with this letter. Note #1 Intraperson; Note #2 (the PNO office); Note #3you determine the fair market value; Note #4 OK if that is the fair market value.
File
Original Image File
(67.67 KB)
Date
Rule
7A(c)(2), 802.4, 802.20
Note #1: Yes.; Note #2, 7A(c)(2) exempts; Note #3, text corrected from less than$15 million to read $15 million or less in non-exempt assets; Note #4, This isnot correct. All that is required to...
File
Original Image File
(78.5 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(c)(1), 802.1(d)(1)
No response provided.
File
Original Image File
(58.46 KB)
Date
Rule
801.10
Note # 1 - inserted the word "contract"; Notes #2 and #3 - OK called (redacted) 10/29/99. I concur with the conclusions of this letter.
File
Original Image File
(67.92 KB)
Date
Rule
801.2(d); 801.2(e)
Yes - they are acquiring voting securities of a new issuer (combined Able and Baker) not voting securities of a "successor" to Able. N. Ovuka agrees. 10/21/99
File
Original Image File
(41.13 KB)
Date
Rule
801.10, 801.90
Note #1 - Agree. Agree that acquisition price does not exceed $15 mm. Advised caller that the board of the acquiror must also determine that the fair market value of the assets will not exceed $15 mm...
File
Original Image File
(77.3 KB)
Date
Rule
7A(c)(10), 801.1(b)(2), 802.30
Agree that 7A(c)(10) exempts this transaction. R. Smith and M. Bruno concur. 10/20/99
File
Original Image File
(54.58 KB)
Date
Rule
7A(c)(1); 802.1
Writer asked me to review this in Dick Smith's absence. The assets being sold do not constitute an operating unit. Exempt as ordinary course of business. P. Sharpe concurs. B. Michael Verne 10/19/99
File
Original Image File
(67.57 KB)
Date
Rule
802.51
Called (redacted) 10/14/99. I concur
File
Original Image File
(37.48 KB)
Date
Rule
801.11(b0(2)
Agree - size of person test is not satisfied. 10/7/99. TH concurs.
File
Original Image File
(26.85 KB)
Date
Rule
802.2(a)
Note #1 - Disagree that this is not an operating unit because it has not been operated.. Note #2 - No. Note #3 - Agree that this transaction is exempt as the purchase of a new facility. N. Ovuka...
File
Original Image File
(62.15 KB)
Date
Rule
801.10(b)
10/5 TH concurs
File
Original Image File
(64.66 KB)
Date
Rule
802.50(b); 802.51(b)
Agree - no filing is required. N. Ovuka concurs.
File
Original Image File
(46.25 KB)
Date
Rule
7A(c)(4); 801.1(a)(2)
(none)
File
Original Image File
(99.9 KB)
Date
Rule
7A(c)(4), 801.1(a)(20,
(none)
File
Original Image File
(54.6 KB)
Displaying 3041 - 3060 of 4612