Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.
Displaying 3121 - 3140 of 4612
Date
Rule
801.11
5/24/99-Advised writer that we agreed with deduction of amounts paid to Company B, which are passed onto worksite employees (with benefits and payroll taxes), thus making of non-reportable size.
File
Original Image File
(41.96 KB)
Date
Rule
801.2
5/24/99-Called writer and advised that As providing B with advertising and promotional services and contract was not an acquisition of assets by B and illegible no report for this side of the...
File
Original Image File
(23.79 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(b)
Called writer on 5/20/99. Agree with analysis. [note 1-Among Mr. B, Mr. Bs father (and Mr. B agreed)]-[note 2-Mr. B can designate 1 director (33.3%) and Mr. B hold (33.3%). Thus Mr. B controls.
File
Original Image File
(48.76 KB)
Date
Rule
802.10; 7A (c)(10)
5/18/99-Left phone mail message for writer advising that the PM "illegible" Office agrees with this conclusion
File
Original Image File
(41.97 KB)
Date
Rule
Item 4(c)
Agree. This is not a 4(c) document 5/10/99
File
Original Image File
(21.34 KB)
Date
Rule
802.9; 7A(c)(9)
5/7/99-Advised writer that under present factual setting, A can purchase 1.7% of voting stock of B and claim the 802.9 exemption. However, the Premerger Office is of the view that the last two...
File
Original Image File
(129.17 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(c)(3); 801.1(b)
5/7/99 - Called writer and advised that Premerger Office can and will only look at settlor’s power to remove and replace trustees of a trust. Settlor has that power here and, thus, controls trust and...
File
Original Image File
(99.24 KB)
Date
Rule
801.40 802.20
Agree-No filing is required 5/6/99- Dick Smith concurs [note 1-who is partnership? Y corporation?]-[note 2-All shareholders of Newco have been identified prior to this transaction]-[note 3- more than]...
File
Original Image File
(68.16 KB)
Date
Rule
7A(c)(2) 802.20
No filings required. B. Michael Verne 5/4/99
File
Original Image File
(86.65 KB)
Date
Rule
802.2(c)(1)
5/3/99-Writer advises that seller is a timber holder for a paper company which is also a sub of the acquired person. Timber is held in checker-board parcels across VA. No separate parcel has had sales...
File
Original Image File
(77.17 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1
Agree that this fact scenario does not require a filing. Asked the writer to revise the language in the last paragraph of analysis section. B. Michael Verne 5/3/99. Dick Smith concurs Note 1-illegible...
File
Original Image File
(153 KB)
Date
Rule
7A(c)(2); 802.1; 802.4
See below
File
Original Image File
(61.04 KB)
Date
Rule
801.40; 801.10; 801.11(e)
Agree that this transaction is not reportable. B. Michael Verne 4/30/99 Dick Smith concurs. (also see margin notes below)
File
Original Image File
(84.08 KB)
Date
Rule
802.2(d); FI #15; See ABA Practice Manual ## 109 and 115
Called writer on 4/27/99. Control of respective expanded boards is not taking place. No HSR filing required. R.S. Agrees. Alice Villavicencio [note-1-self perpetuating board]
File
Original Image File
(163.77 KB)
Date
Rule
801.1(f); 802.23; 802.31;801.30
4/26/99 - Called writer and agreed with his conclusions. Confirmed that Acquiring Person would need to file as an 801.30. RBSmith
File
Original Image File
(51.2 KB)
Date
Rule
802.2(e); 802.5
Agree - The acquisition of the realty associated with the hotel and casino, where none of the licenses or gaming equipment is being acquired, can be exempted under 802.2(e). The acquisition of the...
File
Original Image File
(41.05 KB)
Displaying 3121 - 3140 of 4612